Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Toups Technology Licensing, Inc (TOUP) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Howard Williams who wrote (154)	12/29/1998 4:52:00 PM
From: Andrew H	Respond to of 317

>>Andrew H, can you get someone to explain what is meant by "1.653 Gigawatts of output of AquaFuel"?.....I thought it was a gas. Or is that the energy equivalent of the AF output when combusted? Also, how does one get distilled water out of this? I thought the whole idea was to carefully collect the AF above the plasma/liquid and save it to burn. Is steam a by-product too? Also, it sounds like the "Utility" is getting power FROM this venture as opposed to supplying it TO it. << I am guessing that the gigawatts refers to the amount of electricity which will be produced by the combustion of AquaFuel. That is the only way it would make sense, I think. Isn't a watt a measure of electrical energy? I think that a PR will be out soon clarifying this. The legalese in SEC documents is always a bit confusing. Just got this from the actual contract available on free edgar: >>At a minimum, the resultant AquaFuel(a) production facility must be able to manufacture sufficient AquaFuel(a) to generate 1.653 gigawatts of electric power during a twenty-year period.<< Clearly there are some steps to be taken before full on AquaFuel/electrical production begins. But it is highly encouraging IMO that both TOUP and the US are willing to make such a strong committment. Both must have good reason to believe this will be successful.