Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Zonagen (zona) - good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hank who wrote (6021)	12/30/1998 5:55:00 AM
From: Linda Kaplan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7041

Nice review, Hank. Burton should read it for himself, instead of listening to hypesters. If anything "killed" the thread, it was the hypesters' not being able to tolerate the truth, and their lies being exposed. Linda

To: Hank who wrote (6021)	12/30/1998 10:27:00 AM
From: Dauntless	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7041

Hank - I see you've had a relapse From time to time you seem to be able to make rational, if negative, comments on this thread. Now is apparently not one of those times. Could it be that you simply can't control your hatred of this company? Why is that? Or perhaps, just maybe, you'll post anything in an effort to nudge the price downward? Your comments regarding the SEC filings are dishonest - or just stupid. - The $167K royalty payment was for the SECOND quarter - the sales occurred in June when the distribution channel was loaded. - The 10Q claim that the quarter ending Sept. 30 had no product royalties is correct - that quarter does not include June - DUH! - The 10Q claim that $167 of royalty had been earned referred to the YTD or 9 month totals, which would WOULD include the loading sales - DUH!! - Product Sales (FTI sales) are listed on the 10Q at $2.5 million for the 9 months - versus $167K royalties - so FTI sales were 15 TIMES royalty income - wouldn't you call that "Substantially all"? - DUH!!! It appears the only confusion is that which you, and others, are attempting to create. In contrast, you are correct about the stand-up nature of the guys that run Zonagen.