Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Curtis who wrote (6457)	12/30/1998 11:01:00 AM
From: FMK	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Here's another reminder exchange2000.com As far as my own estimate of 0.1% chance of failure, I find Lev's statement particularly relevant:"...he did mention some new equipment he ordered & pointedly stated he wouldn't, in a million years, have ordered it if he thought there was a chance of failure." IMO the stock has become very oversold over misinterpretation of the s3 which listed Cal Reed as the CEO. The revised financing was very positive and the stock should have risen from the $8 level as a result. I would expect some major market forces to awaken on their return from the holidays.

To: John Curtis who wrote (6457)	12/30/1998 11:22:00 AM
From: Mark Johnson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

John I remember Lev saying in a recent conference call that he didn't plan on disclosing when Valence would be shipping batteries and wasn't required to if a material event hadn't occurred. I guess that could mean a contract had not been inked. But shipping batteries in quantities wherever they want and not disclosing that information through a press release is not a requirement. The mission of Zeev and his entourage seem to be bent on skewing and twisting legal jargon. Zeev has spent hours and hours here ampilfying nonsense and comparing Valence to companies with totally different circumstances (apples to oranges). To believe he doesn't have other motives than his alleged goodwill would be naive in the extreme. I think part of his thrust is "EGO" driven. The other part is an effort to disguise his true intent!