SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jlallen who wrote (25142)12/30/1998 12:58:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
I find you revolting, JLA. Of course, you do have the grace to spread your unit output far and wide, as opposed to your truly tasteless tag team buddy Billy Boy. Would you care to take on sometimes heir-apparent GWB, as in:

"There are some great admonitions in the Bible, talking about, you know; don't try to take the speck out of your neighbor's eye when you've got a log in your own," Bush says. "I'm mindful of that."

You're of a different mind, of course. As I said, I retch in horror at the idea of reading yours. Log in the eye is the least of your problems.



To: jlallen who wrote (25142)12/30/1998 1:23:00 PM
From: iandiareii  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
 
jim

You write:
<<Nevertheless, you presume with customary liberal arrogance to dictate what the thoughts of others mean. You have repeated this objectionable practice on many occasions, spinning the thoughts of others to fit your valueless agenda. I find the practice revolting. Most humans would. JLA >>

Here's what you posted five minutes earlier, Jim. You begin with a quote from another poster, then you append only this comment:

<<Translation = I can't stand having you guys keep pointing out my hypocrisy and the utter lack of merit in my position. >>

This seems precisely the practice you describe. You've taken another's words and 'translated' them. What is your translation but the "arrogance to dictate what the thoughts of others mean" and "spinning the thoughts of others to fit your valueless agenda"?