Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rose Rose who wrote (1038)	12/30/1998 5:38:00 PM
From: the gator	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2390

The truly frightening thing here is these people have the right to vote. Bill Clinton the anti-christ? This fruitloop is allowed to teach and coach young people. I mean Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot could get my vote but Clinton? My god these people are self delusioned. Can you imagine them carte blanche running this country the bombing of Viet Nam would look like a church outing by comparison to what they would do.

To: Rose Rose who wrote (1038)	12/30/1998 7:45:00 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2390

OK, Rose, I'll bite one last time. This time I'll parse your moronic post and answer each of your diversionary questions individually. Speaking of "wiggling", you haven't answered my question. How many causes did you donate money to in the past year? Now why would I want to assist you in changing the subject? The topic was how selfish and hypocritical liberals are, not how generous conservatives are. (Even if I did answer, you would not like my response, for it would not be what you want to hear.) Bill, you've done a splendid job of illustrating the exact process by which right-wing extremists attempt to prove their childish claims. And exactly how have I done this? Which extremists? And which childish claims? You do not know how much money I make in a year, which causes I support, which causes I've donated money to and how much money I have donated, and yet you state: >>Being a selfish, sanctimonious liberal means inflicting the funding requirements of YOUR causes on others.<< I don't want to know how much money you make. What does that have to do with my point? Bill, as we all know, it is the conservatives who are selfish -- We do? Only a dimwit would say that. You obviously haven't given this much thought. otherwise, why would you be whining so piteously about having to pay tax dollars to help support worthy causes? Who's whining? Now this is a typical programmed liberal response. Pretend to take the high road by hurling your own guilt at those who don't want to be forced to support your causes. And I am hardly sanctimonious. No, more like self-righteously unctuous. I merely believe that I am a moral person who lives a decent life and obeys the laws of my country. I would like to believe that, but... You may live a decent life, Bill, and you may obey the laws, but your willingness to twist the truth I do not twist the truth. I challenge you to prove that obnoxious statement. You, the defender of the World's greatest Truth Twister, are accusing me? and your penchant for sneering at that which you do not understand Again, obvious canting, showcasing your jealousy for the rigidity of my arguments. shows quite clearly that you are not a moral man, nor are you capable of even understanding what true morality is. Even more desperate ranting. You ought to see someone about your problem. And on top of all that, you're a complete idiot, because you believe that Clinton is the Antichrist. And the beat continues. I used the antichrist analogy as hyperbole because it fits. As you fashion yourself as some kind of educated debater, you end your pretentious post with a litany of empty catcalls which reveal your truly vacant mind. I expected more from you Rose. But then again, at the risk of sounding redundant, you're a witless liberal.

To: Rose Rose who wrote (1038)	12/31/1998 2:32:00 AM
From: Bob Lao-Tse	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2390

>>>>Being a selfish, sanctimonious liberal means inflicting the funding requirements of YOUR causes on others.<< Bill, as we all know, it is the conservatives who are selfish -- otherwise, why would you be whining so piteously about having to pay tax dollars to help support worthy causes? Neat how you substituted the word "your" with the word "worthy." In this you clearly demonstrate the elitist penchant for reflexively believing that "your" causes are "worthy" causes, and that those who don't want to give money to "your" causes are obviously selfish, since everybody knows that they are such "worthy" causes. It should be up to each individual to decide what causes he or she feels to be "worthy." That's what we call "freedom."