Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ABTX - Agribiotech -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: W Shakespeare who wrote (6700)	12/31/1998 11:32:00 AM
From: c-man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8359

W.S., I am not so sure this is a big event either way personally and would not be surprised to see ABTX not make mention of it. By now, ABTX almost demeans their own efforts to respond to this one media source. THAT POINT IS CLEAR TO ME ANYWAY as a shareholder, and I DO NOT need ABTX's PUBLIC RESPONSE to feel any different. I am comfortable knowing that if from Bloomberg, it's puffery and groundless and working from an agenda that's 180 opposed to mine. Bloomberg & Shorts timed it for today...innuendo and substantiated rumor should not always be redressed. I think that's why Evans is becoming more frustrated...he can't even get a call back from ABTX management so deep is his credibility factor in the toilet. That's got to hurt for a media type who, seemingly, would always require a balanced position and response for both sides of a discussion. Bloomberg - guilty by association and failure to supervise. c-man

To: W Shakespeare who wrote (6700)	12/31/1998 11:41:00 AM
From: Mark Buczynski	Respond to of 8359

W S..... Bloomberg reporting of this "news" should be taken with a pound of salt, as with all of their others relating to ABTX. The SMART money knows the truth. And by the way.....who says negotiations are totally dead anyway...Bloomberg? Food for thought.....

To: W Shakespeare who wrote (6700)	12/31/1998 11:45:00 AM
From: c-man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8359

WS, additionally, this Yahoo poster, who identifies himself as a professional trader who knows zilch about the seed industry, really lines up the reasons for ignoring the din of Doomsberg noise - post.messages.yahoo.com@m2.yahoo.com I especially like the next to last sentence (quote) by this guy. No, standing by silently while innuendo passes overhead is not always the best course of action...but in this case, I don't think it's INAPPROPRIATE to just let Doomsberg get it out of their system. They are the only ones getting ruined by their sordid approach to "reporting the news". c-man