Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (27494)	12/31/1998 6:46:00 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Well, that is a change from "there is no proof that Clinton did what those nutty, slutty broads said he did." Just because the Arkansas troopers testified that they brought Paula to Clinton's hotel room, and just because her friends and relatives testified that she was horrified and upset afterwards when she described what happens, why would anyone take her word? Just because there is even more corroboration to Monica's story, including documented telephone calls, meetings, and gifts, not to mention the president's own admissions, why would anyone take her word, either? After all, why would anyone disbelieve Bill Clinton?