The DVD consortia gets revenue from the sale of players, China's new VCD player
gets royalties. There don't seem to be any consortia trying to control
the new digital VHS players.
In the past we have always known a couple days in advance that CUBE would issue a news piece before the shows and what it would say. Anybody find anything on ZiVA2? I didn't.
Here's a Sept piece on TiVO, Replay, from the SJMercury News.......
Until that CES piece I hadn't thought about a HD recorder, they must use a couple chips for that one and then they will charge some big bucks. Open Q) How many Gs of space will it take/hr of HD storage?
Thursday, September 10, 1998
Smart TV recorders get
another player
BY JON HEALEY
Mercury News Staff Writer
A second Silicon Valley company is speeding to market with a new,
intelligent breed of TV recorder, one that searches for programs that
match the viewer's tastes.
Officials at Replay Networks Inc. of Palo Alto say they will begin
selling a high-end version of their recorder in November. Early next
year, they plan to release a less expensive version that will compete
head-to-head with a similar TV service from Sunnyvale-based TiVo
Inc., which doesn't expect its service to reach the general public until
next year.
The two companies have different business models, but their
technology is remarkably similar. Both hope to change the way
people experience TV by making it much easier to record programs,
allowing viewers to adjust the networks' schedules to fit their own.
This concept is known in the TV industry as ''time shifting,'' and it
was one of the factors behind the invention of the VCR. Although
most households now have a VCR, few people actually use them to
record programs -- in part because people have trouble programming
them, in part because people like to watch popular shows at the same
time their friends and co-workers do.
The ReplayTV box, like the TiVo Center, uses computer technology
to make programming simple, even automatic. The two devices
enable people to record programs by selecting them via remote
control from an on-screen program guide, rather than having to set
times and dates.
They also allow viewers to record every episode of a particular show,
any show featuring a particular actor, or all shows falling into a
specified category, such as westerns. Both companies plan to offer
theme-based recording packages, too, such as movies recommended
by well-known critics.
The devices store programs on a high-capacity computer disk that
can play back as it records. This feature enables viewers to pause,
rewind and play back live TV programs as if they were on tape.
The main difference between the two companies' approaches is that
Replay wants to sell the public just an appliance, while TiVo wants to
sell the box and a $10 monthly programming service.
The initial, full-featured Replay units are expected to sell for $2,000 to
$3,000, chief executive Anthony Wood said, with the later models
selling for around $500. The company may offer an optional,
program-suggesting service for a monthly fee.
TiVo's service, on the other hand, will suggest programs each day to
individual viewers based on what they've indicated in the past that
they liked or disliked. With the viewers' consent, TiVo also will
enable advertisers to tailor their pitches to specific homes. The
revenues from monthly fees will help TiVo keep the price of their
equipment around $300, which is in the range of a VCR.
Both companies are negotiating with consumer-electronics companies
to make and sell their boxes to the masses. Replay also has worked
closely with home-theater dealers to develop its product, while TiVo
has concentrated more on programming and service partnerships with
broadcast networks, satellite operators, cable companies and
advertisers.
''We think we're more customer-focused,'' Replay's Wood said.
TiVo Vice President of Marketing Edward MacBeth counters, ''We
believe the service that we offer is the key to what makes this work.''
Two analysts familiar with both companies said that they did not care
for TiVo's monthly fees, but they had some concerns about Replay's
strategy, too.
''Like the concept; can't tolerate the price -- even for rich
home-theater buffs,'' analyst Gary Arlen said of Replay. He added
that Replay will be ''very vulnerable to others who could put cheap
storage on set-top with a brand name,'' such as Microsoft's WebTV.
Seamus McAteer, an analyst with Jupiter Communications, said
Replay's recorder may appeal only to a ''very select segment'' of the
market unless the company expands the capabilities of its box.
''It could probably have a sizable market at a price of around $500,
$600 if it integrated a DVD player and it didn't wed me to another
bloody bill, thank you very much,'' he said.
|
