SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sean W. Smith who wrote (4561)1/1/1999 2:09:00 PM
From: funk  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14778
 
Corsair 128MB SDRAM 100MHZ PC100 (16x64) $225.00

Corsair 128MB SDRAM 100MHZ PC100 (16x72) $269.00


Any reason to use the more expensive of the two?

Planning on an OC'd celeron on an abit motherboard.

I am assuming the 16x64 memory is more than adequate.

Please advise.

<gggg>

funk



To: Sean W. Smith who wrote (4561)1/1/1999 2:30:00 PM
From: RagTimeBand  Respond to of 14778
 
Sean

>>Why????<< It's either that or Win98. I'm after the dynamic allocation of IRQ's and hardware recognition by the OS. I'm assuming that NT4 still doesn't have those features.

Emory



To: Sean W. Smith who wrote (4561)1/2/1999 12:54:00 AM
From: mowa  Respond to of 14778
 
Sean,

I am unclear if you are asking why NT or why NT5?

I can think of answers to both, IMO compelling answers. In a nutshell NT has what 95/98 lacks, stability and security. And NT5 has what NT4 lacks, as Emory stated, better dynamic resource allocation, improved system management interface, and more as well.

mowa


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News