SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RockyBalboa who wrote (1078)1/1/1999 4:53:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 19428
 
Very Good Christian, you are getting deadly. Let me guess on the Y stocks: IBUY for sure and on perhaps (just guessing) IFLY. IFLY will fry and these idjoits just bark w/o reading.



To: RockyBalboa who wrote (1078)1/1/1999 6:10:00 PM
From: kurt aichler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
Christian, i really don't see your point regarding the option redemption clauses in the recent filing. the "Contingent Options" represent only 25,000 shares that the company has the right to buy back from their consultant. They could buy back these options for 5k, if the stock is above $10 for ten days. Big deal ! What they were trying to do is limit the compensation to their consultant that produced their website. They obviously are anticipating a potential increase in their stock price and don't want the consultant to make more than a certain amount of money. the majority of the stock options paid to the consultant that created the web site are for fixed stock price amounts. the other stock options obviously relate to executive and employee incentives. Don't you think anyone would want to take steps like these, prior to any anticipated stock increase ? i don't think it sounds as fishy as you would like it to be.

jmo

kurt



To: RockyBalboa who wrote (1078)1/2/1999 9:05:00 AM
From: valueminded  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 19428
 
Christian
So given this information, this would seem to be a good short at anything above $10. Agree / Disagree ? thanks