SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tunica Albuginea who wrote (791)1/1/1999 7:48:00 PM
From: Chuzzlewit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 41369
 
Tunica, you observed <iI had to swallow hard to buy the high PE.

One of the first lessons you ought to learn is that PE is a meaningless metric, baby boomer or not. Just consider the following problems:

-- A company with revenues close to break-even will have an astronomical P/E that can come down like an avalanche with just a small increase in sales. Here is a hypothetical: suppose we have a company trading at $10 (purely arbitrary choice here) with earnings of $.01. That gives a p/e of 1,000. But suppose you discover that that it had sales per share of say $4.00, gross margin of 50%, and fixed costs of $1.99 per share. Next year it increases its sales by 25%, and everything else is the same. Now you have earnings of $.51/share, and all of a sudden you have a stock trading at a p/e of 19.6!

-- P/E is a backward looking metric. It compares last year's earnings to this year's price. So it isn't even an inverted yield, which would compare next year's earnings to the current price.

-- P/E is a peculiar metric because it is a stock (price) divided by a flow (earnings). When you do the arithmetic you find out that iut has the unit of "time", because earnings is really $/time. So, in order to get a pure number you need to divide through by an appropriate time parameter. That's why a growth rate is the appropriate multiplier -- you get rid of the time unit that way.

-- P/E is insensitive to two of the major drivers of stock prices: risk-free rate of interest and the stream of expected free cash flows.

Now you know why I never pay attention to P/E. At best it's yesterday's news. At worst it's yesterday's editorial.

TTFN,
CTC

PS, this is the first I've ever had a discussion with a gonadal membrane.



To: Tunica Albuginea who wrote (791)1/1/1999 8:49:00 PM
From: Uncle Frank  Respond to of 41369
 
Nice to run into you again, Tunica. Hope you've prospered in the past few months. I stumbled into aol at the end of November, and am up about 70%. It feels pretty good, so I'm hanging around for a while <g>.

Frank



To: Tunica Albuginea who wrote (791)1/1/1999 9:33:00 PM
From: HG  Respond to of 41369
 
Great strategy. We should keep in touch. I do the same.

HG