Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Concurrent Computer (CCUR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ted M who wrote (6282)	1/2/1999 10:48:00 AM
From: ENOTS	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21143

goodbye ted, will miss you, can you tell me where you intend to post, so I can also, I am looking for the forum where everyone is honest and truthful..with no BS or anything like that. so clue us in, we are looking for that ultimate posting site!

To: Ted M who wrote (6282)	1/2/1999 12:13:00 PM
From: Christiaan McDonald	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21143

Ted, a lot of Ports posts were tongue in cheek type and I never took them seriously and I am really surprised that SEAC and TNCX took them seriously. I don't own either stock and I never will as long as current management is in place. If they don't have any more to do than chase critics on the Internet then they need to get busy. The post they forced Port to make is so ridiculous I can't believe it. I mean forcing someone to say "their products are excellent". That is totally meaningless and its obvious no one took it seriously because the stock of both companies did not respond. In my opinion, SEAC and TNCX are the losers here, not Jeff. Ken