Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (25574)	1/2/1999 2:22:00 AM
From: Bob Lao-Tse	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

Borzou, I've been wondering if it is indeed true that the Senate can only consider the articles that were approved by the House. I've assumed this to be the case, but I don't actually know. Any input? Regards, BLT

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (25574)	1/2/1999 12:53:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Happy New Year BD. BTW, thank you for the copies of your publication. I really enjoyed them and I plan to subscribe if you will sell a subscription to a "rabid right winger" like myself. As to Clinton's perjury, in my analysis, his grand jury testimony incorporated much of his Lewinski deposition by reference and hence the misguided thought that because an article was not passed on the Lewinski depo that somehow spells trouble for the perjury case is of course fallacious. It may make it more difficult a case but only incrementally so. I'd have to go back and read the testimony again line by line (and will do so) to give you the exact statements I believe are patently perjurious. JLA