Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (44583)	1/2/1999 11:39:00 AM
From: Cirruslvr	Respond to of 1571680

Brian - RE: "The L3 cache will be stuck at 100 mhz unless they start using the 112 mhz option on some super 7 boards . However the L2 cache will run at 450 mhz since it is on chip and running at CPU speed ." He is talking about the K6-2. You are talking about the K6-3. RE: " sorry Cirruslvr but I read your comment to Paul and had to reply indirectly since I find reading Paul's drivel such a waste of time." Yup, can't go wrong with saying that most of the time.

To: Brian Hutcheson who wrote (44583)	1/3/1999 11:10:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571680

Hutch - Re: "Re. K6-2 450 L2 cache stuck at 100mhz What ignorance on the part of Paul ! The L3 cache will be stuck at 100 mhz unless they start using the 112 mhz option on some super 7 boards . However the L2 cache will run at 450 mhz since it is on chip and running at CPU speed . " Looks like you BLEW ANOTHER GASKET ! The K6-2 ain't got no L2 cache on chip ! You have definitely shown how little you understand what is going on with AMD ! Keep responding to Cringe ! I know you're afraid to address confrontation directly. Since you make such bone-head errors - your behavior is quite understandable ! Paul