SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Trader J's Inner Circle -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DM who wrote (3022)1/2/1999 11:51:00 AM
From: melinda abplanalp  Respond to of 56535
 
DM-Good question. Also I would like to know how owning the parent company helps you with the IPO? Do You get free shares of the IPO because you own the parent or does that make give you a special privledge to buy the shares. Also if you have a discount broker can you still buy the shares. I thought only the full service brokers carries IPO shares.

Any help with this would be appreciated.

Melinda



To: DM who wrote (3022)1/2/1999 12:41:00 PM
From: Cookie Monster  Respond to of 56535
 
RE: Companies Launching An IPO (DM)

The value of a company, such as NAVR, launching an IPO is in the fact that the Parent company usually still ownes a large chunk of the stock in their new spinoff. Just as MALL owned a large chunk of UBID. When the new Internet IPO spinoff takes off and runs to obscene prices, the parent company is all of a sudden worth a lot more money.

Later,
CM



To: DM who wrote (3022)1/2/1999 4:48:00 PM
From: Poet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 56535
 
Hi DM and Melinda,

Cookie Monster gave you as short and clear an answer as I can give to the question of valuations of parent companies spinning off IPO's. This is where my psychological training serves me well: essentially, people believe in the "halo effect", than when something good happens to one thing, the effect of the good spreads to the things near it, in this case, the parent company. This is why you'll see in daytraders' rooms when a particular company is spiking, an experienced trader will often call another company which is in the same business and that will spike as well. This is a psychological trading play more than one based on news or fundamentals, but a legitimate play nonetheless.
Poet



To: DM who wrote (3022)1/2/1999 5:57:00 PM
From: Wes Stevens  Respond to of 56535
 
In the case of DBCC they now own 50% of marketwatch with CBS owning the other 50%. After the IPO they will own 38%. If the IPO goes through the roof the 38% they still own will make DBCC worth a lot more. Same with navr, they own 100% of netradio and will own 80% after the ipo.

When you think of it it really makes no sense. If marketwatch is really that valuable then DBCC should be worth more before the ipo then after. But such is life and the internuts.



To: DM who wrote (3022)1/2/1999 8:06:00 PM
From: zora  Respond to of 56535
 
DM
Re: IPOs

I bought USAI because they owned a large % of the IPO TMCS (Ticketmaster). Well they did spike up at first, but quickly settled back. My daytrade became an investment. I would rather own TMCS directly. I see comments about TMCS and how it could run but nothing much about USAI. I don't think the "parent trap" works all the time. :)