Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Afaq Sarwar who wrote (8796)	1/2/1999 6:16:00 PM
From: Mama Bear	Respond to of 10479

"Regardless of what Barb says, it is evident by her tactics that she is not going to start a short position in Osicom on Monday. She already has a short position. " No wonder you can conclude that Osicom is a good company, you don't need any of those annoying facts before you jump to a conclusion. I really feel sorry for you Afaq, you must be another of those folks who believe the chatter causes the event, and not the event causing the chatter. Barb

To: Afaq Sarwar who wrote (8796)	1/3/1999 10:11:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10479

Afaq, have you been drinking Kool Aide again? I mean this just a tad bit convoluted is it not?: "Now, lets talk about the "connections" that Auric has. If the connection he has ( unless it is merely a fantasy) knew any thing, they would have told him to look for the stock trading above 40 by the end of February. And if they told him that, I would say that they are being conservative. They would have told him at this point in time the stock is worth 50 to 60 without any consideration to any of the things that are in the works, and are not public yet. They would have told him that the stock is in a correction mode until it reaches its present fair value. If those connections knew any thing, they would have told him about the identity of the new lead underwriter for the NetSilicon IPO. If these were "in the know" connections, they would have told him about the big joint venture that is in the works. And on and on..... So much for the connections." I'm sorry, what the eff are you babbling about?