Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IFLY - travel sales on the web pure play -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pluvia who wrote (3357)	1/2/1999 4:44:00 PM
From: Sergio H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4761

<1. Are you paid PR? 2. Have you recieved any stock directly from the company or through any arms length transactions to promot this company?> NO. and NO. Stevie, did you have help in putting those thoughts together and in a post? They were actually good, valid questions. I'm beginning to like you Stevie...first for your humor (still laughing about the stewerdess stuff (yuk, yuk)) Now for your DD. You are really on top of this stock. Threatening me with legal action is the way to go. Can you ask your buddy Auric where he found the S-1 and why we need to read it? Hey, what time is Mr. Pink coming? Does he know anymore about this stock than you do ?

To: Pluvia who wrote (3357)	1/2/1999 4:48:00 PM
From: Todd Pagel	Respond to of 4761

To all "bashing" posters: Why use these ambiguous abbreviations? If you want to call somebody a criminal just say " is a criminal to the best of my knowledge, or is engaging in criminal activities." Sign on the dotted line and go about your business. Of course I am assuming that is the correct word. If not, please tell me exactly what you are trying to say. All this insinuation and guilt by inference is really quite tedious. I have an open mind on this topic, but vague references sway me to the long position. They seem to have far more facts at their disposal. Just MHO