Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RockyBalboa who wrote (2311)	1/2/1999 8:52:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 122087

I choose companies with dedicated targets reaching further into the next century, Christian, Then you have not done enough diligence on TAVA. Their CEO is quite assertive about attracting post-Y2K business. And the industries that they deal with (look at their Fortune 100 client list) will have continuing need to automate and vertically integrate their manufacturing floor operations after 2000 bands-aid wear out their usefulness. But right now in the manufacturing sector, Y2K is the priority, and it's where the money is. How y2k companies translate their business into long-term contracts is certainly crucial and something that I believe TAVA has great potential to achienve, indepently or as an acquisition. A parallel is that some people AOL is an internut company with limited profit potential and competition from other ISP services. But to others it is a media company with long-range value inherent in its name and service. It is merely a matter of perception. The problem is that the company begam attracting the likes of Bill Wexler and Mr. Pink, because one part of their business plan failed to expand like they originally thought. However, last quarter they reported .14/share, and this quarter projections are for .23/share. They outright called the company a scam and said it would trade below $3 and never recover again. They certainly didn't limit their comments to whether or not the company was merely suffering temporary setbacks in that particular quarter. They outright called the company a scam and accused those who posted there as a bunch of hypsters who were trying to terrorize others about Y2K through false information. That is why I get a little sensitive about the subject. If this thread is maintain its credibility, it has to attempt to fairly determine value and future potential of particular companies and their stocks. It should not become the breeding groung of innuendo referencing ZA and IFLY, when from all I know or have seen reported indicates that Zahran is merely an investor in TAVA and not a business associate. Shorting stocks through false innuendo or accusations of fraud can do outright long-term damage to a company and its stock. It should not be a label or accusation that is made lightly. Especially in light of the extraordinary extravagances being perpetrated by many of the other SEVERELY overvalued Internut stocks who face potential competitors from all directions. Sorry if I came off a bit harsh, but there are quite a few TAVA shareholders who are finally beginning to see the results of their long wait being realized by the company. They are a bit sensitive as well. Regards, Ron