Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 1SFG who wrote (9902)	1/2/1999 9:36:00 PM
From: Grainne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Senator Lott is trying as hard as he can to avoid even having witnesses testify, if there is a trial. There are a lot of Democratic office holders who also think Clinton is guilty of the charges, incidentally, and have said so, and still want censure instead of conviction in the Senate. Your first problem is that Lott stating that there is "overwhelming" evidence the president is guilty is quite different from the idea of many Senators being on record as being ready to vote guilty. You are the one who made the statement: <<Since the Senate would sit as a jury if there is a trial and many Senators' comments are already on record as being ready to vote guilty, do you see a problem with that?> You have mentioned exactly one senator, not "many". It is your job to prove your statement, or admit it is false. I will do my own research when I am making a point, but it is your responsibility in this case, if you want to try and prove that what you said is true.