Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (9928)	1/3/1999 12:01:00 AM
From: Adamson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

X, I also wouldn't vote for someone based on their private sexual relationships (I hope I didn't give that impression). I think most Americans also feel this way, which explains the 70% job approval ratings (Clinton defenders have successfully fooled many into believing this is "just about sex" -- Repeat a lie often enough...) Also, I don't mean to suggest that just because Republicans tend to be "moral absolutists" that they necessarily have more honesty or integrity, just that their principles guide their actions in these matters (though many are, as I said, hypocritical and self-rightious). >>Far from being a witch-hunt, I think this is a case that tests just how lax we are willing to be with a charismatic leader that does wrong.<< Well said! I am constantly amazed (disturbed) by how much style trumps substance these days. I hope America's next president, be he democrat, republican, or reform, has more integrity. Perjury and obstruction of justice (which the evidence seems to support) by the country's commander-in-chief should not be overlooked just because the economy is going strong. JMHO Regards, Adamson BTW - >>LOL<< (last post) why? just curious...