Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rainman who wrote (2333)	1/3/1999 8:26:00 AM
From: RockyBalboa	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

rainman, ron reece. Still you are referring to the word scam, which I have shown previously not to have used in connection to any of the stocks whichever quality. It is not illegal or sort of any wrongdoing, IMO, to post a link which will provide you with further information on a specific stock, like I did with posting the ZA link. A lot of information very useful for all of you is contained herein. However I refuse to make any further judgements on the quality. It's up to you to check that information. Overvalued and scam are no first-order synonyms. Scam is not a comprehensive reasoning for a stock getting (at least temporarily) overvalued. Even in the 70ies, "the aera of the nifty 50" you'd had a fine assortment of companies with (I call it) "rich" valuation. I'm not aware of any fraudulent connections to that stocks, how should I? In contrast, overvaluation itself and the insight that a transient overvaluation had the (written and well-documented) consequence of improving any certain stakeholder's position to the disadvantage of the average common shareholder/buyer raises some questions, which are also asked in several class action lawsuits against certain companies. Have a nice day C. C.