Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (6650)	1/3/1999 12:55:00 PM
From: Mark Johnson	Respond to of 27311

Larry: John has been stung a little and sold most of his position. He would like to qualify his decision by waiting a little longer. You on the otherhand are purposefully argumentative a point you admitted to. Your speculation about where Valence is, comes from a point of ignorance making assumptions and arriving at conclusions a la Zeev. There, There, Larry are you getting enough attention.

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (6650)	1/3/1999 1:39:00 PM
From: Dennis V.	Respond to of 27311

Larry,your approach is selective and has things bass ackwards. For example, instead of applying a blunt, constructionist reading to that old S3 and shouting "fire", you could have been creative and teased out the real story like others did. In the case of FMK's latest memo to John, you chose to be creative indeed. If your approach to these matters had been balanced, you would have discovered that the S3 was saying that line 3 was being set up for operational safety testing. In addition,there was an outstanding matter of UL testing of product from Line 1. Neither is or was a crisis or even an "event". Furthermore, when a strict "constructionist" reading would have been accurate, you chose to be creative, otherwise would have recognized FMK's gentle reproach was far, far from the sarcastic interpretation offered.