To: Doug (Htfd,CT) who wrote (1333 ) 1/3/1999 6:40:00 PM From: THOMAS GOODRICH Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8858
Doug, Playstar has not likely realized any proceeds from their Partnership program as it was just announced on December 8. I would not construe the Partnership Agreement as a free license or as a licensee per se, but, rather a referring webmaster and ONLY that. In essence, the Partner does not in any way host or operate the site, but, merely provides a persistent link to Playstar's facilities. Further, as I understand it, the Partner would not be engaged in any operating or decision-making capacity other than simply providing a clickable graphic on his or her commercial web site of whatever nature. The Partnership Agreement specifies a commission of up to 40% on net profits to the company rather than 40% flat as a previous poster alluded to. It is possible some web masters will receive nothing and most will ultimately earn less depending on volume. Again, this is my interpretation of Playstar's plan as I have not as yet perused it in detail. Starnet licensees on the other hand would share less to Starnet, but, in some instances may host the media and would typically be responsible for licensure, promotion as well as additional overhead. Some vendors have caps on contractual agreements whereby when a certain level is attained split share (to the vendor) goes to 5% or less. As you can see, this arrangement can be lucrative to licensees with sportsbooks earning millions of dollars annually. Bear in mind that individual licensees have decision making authority over their respective businesses and can opt in or out of referral programs as well as individual customization. TG