Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: long-gone who wrote (25327)	1/3/1999 8:15:00 PM
From: Enigma	Respond to of 116790

Richard - change of subject - have you been in touch with Jack Kemp or others to try to lobby for AG to testify under oath about alleged manipulation of the POG? E

To: long-gone who wrote (25327)	1/3/1999 8:44:00 PM
From: Zardoz	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 116790

"RE: Y2K & gold You don't wish to talk about any reason that gold will go up more, only the reasons you thiink it should go down." Bullcrap. Say the crap you want to, as you say a lot of it anyways. "The purpose of this thread is very simple: To monitor/analyze those factors affecting the price of gold, long-term, short-term, and in-between, and to determine where we currently stand in relation to those factors. Comments on the rest of the precious metals complex are also encouraged, as is technical analyses." State HOW the Y2K effects gold, not post news articles on Y2K problems? Where and why do you see gold rising, and how high? SHOW your analysis. This thread suffers to much from POSTING news releases of the PRESS, and websites, without commenting on it, FOR or AGAINST. Your single mindedness of manipulation of the GOLD markets is the ONE most heavily biased event EVER to occur on this thread. And you still aint got 1 'gold' ounce of proof. Do you believe that Gold-Eagles is a true representation of gold demand?