Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jim kelley who wrote (1186)	1/3/1999 10:51:00 PM
From: Bob Lao-Tse	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2390

Safe sex implies sex that protects one from STD's, not sex that protects one from pregnancy. The use of a condom has been found to be the most reliable way to protect yourself from STD's, and is therefore the basis of "safe sex." Tawdry, according to Webster's, is "showy, but of very poor quality." I believe that at least the cigar fits this definition. But it is a value judgment, and as such has no meaning in a debate, so I withdraw that characterization. As for your points about sexual repression, I agree wholeheartedly. But as this nation has, due to its Christian heritage, always been sexually repressed to at least some degree I don't expect it to stop any time soon. And, to me at least, this whole thing has never been about sex. I know that to some people it is, but I believe that the people who attack Clinton because of sex are just as wrong as the ones who defend him because of it. Nowhere in the articles of impeachment is sex mentioned, and what the Senate does with those articles is all that really matters.