Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: golden_tee who wrote (6689)	1/4/1999 12:37:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Respond to of 27311

Robert, as long as Fred puts out bogus info., I will be here to challenge it. The latest was his claim that VLNC really was "ready to go" a year ago, and simply chose not to. All of the subsequent discussion was a refutation of this ridiculous premise. If you want me to shut up, you might ask Fred to stop posting misinformation. And since you have not bothered to challenge the facts as I've stated them, but chose to attack me instead, I guess you are now a full card-carrying member of the Mark Johnson "kill the messenger club." What an honor.

To: golden_tee who wrote (6689)	1/4/1999 12:42:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Respond to of 27311

And one other point, Robert, if VLNC was really ready to go a year ago but decided they would be better off waiting for the "new and improved" version to come out, why were they providing all of these thousands of samples Fred says they were providing to OEMs? That would really make a lot of sense. Provide production samples to OEMs, have the OEMs design the product into their equipment, and then say "Sorry boys, we were just kidding." "Check back with us in a year when we've got the new and improved model out." Yeah right. Keep believing whatever Fred tells you Robert. Don't believe what the company says, and particularly don't believe the SEC filings. You'll soon be rich.

To: golden_tee who wrote (6689)	1/4/1999 7:07:00 AM
From: Bruce A. Thompson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Robert, Jeez, you guys stoop lower than I've ever seen. now you are personally attacking people for posting a link. Are you calling the link a lie? >>> viwes.com <<< "So shut up already! Find something new to bitch about or move on! I'd challenge the "facts" of your posts," Larry and I aren't really worried about your group of know it all posters. It's the poor new researchers that might come across this thread and think they have found manna from heaven. If you guys will stop the blatent hype, we will stop posting the facts. Bruce

To: golden_tee who wrote (6689)	1/4/1999 7:10:00 AM
From: Zeev Hed	Respond to of 27311

Robert: your name calling: "Larry, Zeev, and the latest parasite on the block. Bruce:" is not appreciated. You can go and join FMK in the "La, La Land" where everything is fine and dandy and enjoy it. Better yet. Why don't you put 50% of your liquid assets in VLNC, kind of an "All or nothing" bet. This parasite does not need this aggravation. Good bye. Zeev

To: golden_tee who wrote (6689)	1/4/1999 12:44:00 PM
From: jbn3	Respond to of 27311

**** Off Topic **** re Larry, Zeev, and the latest parasite on the block. Robert, when logic fails to provide you an adequate response to an argument, do you automatically resort to ad hominem insults and "shoot-the-messenger" cures? Though I do not know "Larry,... and the latest parasite on the block.", I can assure you that I have been a long-time follower of Dr. Hed's posts, and he is anything BUT a parasite. In fact, his willingness to share his extensive technical and market knowledge has saved and/or made me and a lot of other less knowledgeable investors a lot of money. Dr. Hed's scientific and technical credentials are superb, and his posting history is impeccable: I challenge you to show us one instance of a Zeev Hed post which could be construed as 'hype' or 'spam'. If he makes an earnings or price estimate for a particular equity, he is careful to document exactly how he arrived at that estimate, especially what assumptions he made. Now contrast that with Robert Yoest's ... As far as end of year price, I'll say $37. This is based on the most conservative, version of FMK's estimates and a few other twists of my own! ... 'nuff said. FWIW, I have no position at all in VLNC, nor have I ever had one. Like a few <vbg> other SI members, I value Dr. Hed's posts, and take serious umbrage at your slander. bachman nabors