To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (14813 ) 1/4/1999 11:10:00 AM From: Spider Valdez Read Replies (2) | Respond to
ulrich you are zombie & do not question wellrich & in fact promote & defend there dribble by posting there stuff on you web site. one can easily point to the judgement that has never materialized from your groups claims there was an arbitration hearing & a judgement. we know now that those were lies & the docs you posted promoting & defending wellrich were just worthless dribble. we do know that wellrich & this arbitration association wish to order aznt to arbitrate, since aznt has no reason to do so. here is where it gets bad for you web guy. you do not perform any diligence , you simply promote wellrich. i tell you again web guy, kellogg states he did not get his stock from wellrich & he got his stock after peter shurr left wellrich, there for guy wellrich was simply a boiler room & not a b/d, they could not deal securities rendering any agreement with aznt null & void. so what we have web guy is wellrich trying to force arbitration to get a commission on stock that kellogg says he did not get from wellrich. i know you will not perform any diligence here guy but you will see tommorow 5 jan how worthless the doc you posted to promote wellrich is. i also say this to you web guy, SO WHAT, let us pretend there is merit to this document. what will wellrich, a boiler room, achieve arbitrating with aznt? they are not b/d & can not take money for dealing stock. also kellogg states & will attest to fact he did not get his stock from wellrich. BESIDES...janice & jeffrey & YOU have already informed us that the arbitration HAS TAKEN PLACE & THERE WAS A JUDGEMENT AGAINST AZNT!!! , now you tell us that you were only lying to us then & posting BS docs then but NOW...you tell us truth!! lololol! you go on to say i am the liar. i remind you again your group has told us the judgement, many months ago, was being "procured & scanned". now, many months later you tell us there is order to compel arbitration you say was already resolved with a "judgement" at a "hearing". your web site guy is full of wellrich docs promoting this, go look web guy!
