Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rande Is who wrote (1604)	1/4/1999 9:48:00 AM
From: R Hamilton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57584

rande....what do you think about dlia for today? ran to 32 last time it gapped open! rhonda

To: Rande Is who wrote (1604)	1/4/1999 10:04:00 AM
From: melinda abplanalp	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 57584

Sold ACLY and a funny thing happened. 1/2 of sale was at price higher than what I asked for. This is a good signfor the stock...yes? Wonder if I should get back in. Melinda

To: Rande Is who wrote (1604)	1/4/1999 11:22:00 AM
From: Glass House	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57584

Rande, just a quiet "I second that motion". I think the Y2K issue will not really take off. It ran in 98 then crashed, so as a stock group this would be too soon of a recovery. Even if we have a disaster in Jan 1, 2000 it will be too late to turn Y2K stocks profitable except for a couple of last quarters. Plus, this net mania must run it course. It has already been declared dead at least twice in the past four months only to come roaring back. I don't think because a January first date (1999) has passed that trading patterns will suddenly shift that radically. It will shift when we start losing our rear ends on the trades. Until then we will go on ahead, although perhaps not full speed. Just my two cents. Cheers.