Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (1207)	1/4/1999 1:13:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 2390

Do you defend organized crime bosses and drug kingpins? Those are the only kind of prosecutions I've heard of that use the Starr repertoire of setup tactics and strongarming witnesses. You need to take a fresh look at prosecutorial tactics in America. Starr's "tactics" are SPO for many prosecutions, including those of businesses. Then there's the issue of the "secret" grand jury testimony that always seemed to find its way to Drudge in a day or two. Funny, that. I agree it's funny. However, I keep in mind that Clinton's lawyers were debriefing every Grand Jury witness, so their offices, also, had all this information and could have leaked it if they chose to do so.. My understanding is that if they leaked it, it would not be illegal. Also, of course, every grand juror heard the testimony, and could have leaked it illegally (but perhaps lucratively? pure speculation!) So far I know of no reliable information as to where the information came from. To accuse any person or official at this point is not only purile but irresponsible.