Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zardoz who wrote (25381)	1/4/1999 3:01:00 PM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116856

And sir, your have not answered mine. Do you continue to deny the the addition of the "Cash" portion of M-1 to money supply to allow for Y2K withdrawls to begin in June?

To: Zardoz who wrote (25381)	1/4/1999 3:10:00 PM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116856

"You have no opinion on anything. Except me.And your wrong about that, and what I said De judge and jury? Hutch you never ask simple questions - you present loads of hsitorical data, goverment statistics and data which you expect people to read and come to the same conclusions as you. As to the future - if gold jumps $100 (heaven help us) I suggest that we would have a very different sentiment - for you to sit here and say "As it's over valued" is a little presumptious - as well as being in the wrong tense. Do you mean it's over valued now, or WILL be over valued in the future. If it has momentum, many will feel that it is undervalued - even at $386. Your comments show that you are as ever prepared to pre - judge the issue - thus dashing any hopes we may have for witnessing Hutch the roaring bull! E