SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mama Bear who wrote (42110)1/4/1999 3:51:00 PM
From: Tommaso  Respond to of 132070
 
Yes, I have a ton of BEARX and I only wish, of course, that I had bought it at the present price, which is something of a steal in my opinion. Actually Tice is a little leery of shorting the most volatile of the wilcats, and that's why I went ahead and bought the puts.



To: Mama Bear who wrote (42110)1/4/1999 5:01:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 132070
 
Sorry for confusion.



To: Mama Bear who wrote (42110)1/4/1999 6:52:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 132070
 
Hi Barb, I figured out who was bitchin' about her BEARX, it was penni:

techstocks.com

And very funny, too, I might add.<g>



To: Mama Bear who wrote (42110)1/5/1999 9:28:00 PM
From: Don Westermeyer  Respond to of 132070
 
The big problem with BEARX is the high management fees (1.5%) and expense ratios (2.5%). The expense ratio is fine if it saves the fund money, but the management fee seems kind of high. The fund seems to have done well vs shorting either the S&P or NASDAQ directly.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News