Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EMC How high can it go? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Loren who wrote (3511)	1/4/1999 10:17:00 PM
From: SJS	Respond to of 17183

OT - and should be in the DELL thread, but...] I know what he's saying and what you're saying. You're saying the same thing but your time horizons are different. Bear with me. Dell's resting in the 60's after the last earnings report of Q3, 98. It's moved up again into the mid 70's, so very recently, some think it has emerged from it's digestion phase and is "back on the prowl". At this time, it's probable that it will behave more like your chart of the last 3 years, vs the chart of the last 3 months (which was more flat, and what was the subject of Dennis' comment). NOW.......Back to our regularly scheduled information about EMC!!

To: Loren who wrote (3511)	1/4/1999 10:26:00 PM
From: dennis michael patterson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17183

OT* in reply. (This topic has been covered on the Dell thread) Loren, I did not make an argument, I made an assertion. To back up the assertion, I invited you to look at the chart. You've run a regression analysis which you think shows.....what?, that growth has not slowed? I have owned Dell continuously for 3 years or more. I'll be happy to look at a chart (I will!) and get back with you. I don't mind the disagreement-- Dell is always fun to discuss. And on the selling, of course, there is a buyer for every seller and a seller for every buyer. I am sure you did not intend to attribute to me denial of this (virtual) tautology. What I thought I said (suggested?) was that there have been big institutional sellers. This is undeniable. Check out some of the site that track block trades or IBD's money flow data. This assertion is quite empirical, subject to verification by even the most dyed-in-the-wool positivist. Steve's take on this is, I think, accurate. :)