SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dave Hanson who wrote (4664)1/4/1999 10:51:00 PM
From: Zeuspaul  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14778
 
c: FAT 95 AND with an NT maintenance minimal install; 1 gig;

I do not quite follow you here Dave. What is *AND with an NT maintenance install? Do you have Win95 and NT installed in a FAT 16 primary partition on your first harddrive? Which one boots...do you use a boot manager to select between Win95 and the NT minimal install?? Is this the NT OS loader option?? How do you boot the D main NT install in the extended partition?? also accessed with the NT OS loader??

no primary, only an extended partition, 3 FAT logical partitions (e,f,g)

Is this a typo? With c,d,and e on drive 1 drive 2 would be f,g,and h?

Zeuspaul



To: Dave Hanson who wrote (4664)1/7/1999 11:48:00 AM
From: Clarence Dodge  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14778
 
Dave

my partition strategy, again FWIW:

Very useful indeed..... and interesting in comparison to zp's one large partition. As an organizational issue I am gravitating toward having Os/utilities and apps/data on separate partitions as you have it.
I would attempt such partitioning later as per Spots prudent thinking and maybe a little more back and forth here as to the merits of each. The one large partition on each drive is what I have now, its what Jon setup altough I asked for other volumes to be created I'm glad he left it simple as he did so I have more time to inform myself as to which partitioning suits me best.

Clarence