Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: golden_tee who wrote (6738)	1/4/1999 11:16:00 PM
From: MGV	Respond to of 27311

hello little man! You didnt read the Yahoo MIKL thread or you wouldnt still be asking your foolish questions. Are there any sincere analytical thoughts behind the blank look you project? If so, come clean! Lets hear it! What do you think you know? Your fingers keep typing words but I just don't see any substance.

To: golden_tee who wrote (6738)	1/4/1999 11:39:00 PM
From: MGV	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Every time I see someone express or imply that a post on this insignificant, mostly unintelligent, almost wholly unimpressive thread could be expected to move the stock price, it reminds me how delusional people can be! "You sold out. The stock moved up. You want to buy back in lower. You'll spin the same crap every night in the hope you can knock the price down." yoest let me suggest that, intellectually speaking, your myopia is so acute, so severe, that you require, metaphorically speaking, the thickest, most concave coke-bottle lens your head could hold without toppling over. And it still wouldn't address that problem of blinders!

To: golden_tee who wrote (6738)	1/5/1999 1:32:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Robert, from now on, whenever somebody questions my motives for arguing with Fred, I will repost this example of just a few of Fred's collection of predictions. Now I know that anybody who has a shred of objectivity knows Fred's track record by now. But just in case there are any newcomers reading this thread, I recommend they read the following posts to get an idea of this wonderful record of, shall we say, optimism. Here are my nominations for best posts: 1st Quarter '97: Message 723535 2nd Quarter '97 Message 1122594 3rd Quarter '97 Message 1647052 4th Quarter '97 Message 2591737 1st Quarter '98 Message 3419792 2nd Quarter '98 Message 5056600 3rd Quarter '98 Message 5587221 4th Quarter '98 Message 6976687 Not a very good track record for all of those knowledgeable sources, I'm afraid. Yet a few on this thread question the motives of those who choose to disagree with this poster and his wonderful track record. Kind of makes you wonder about their motives, doesn't it? Go ahead Robert, keep questioning my motives. I've bookmarked this post for easy access when you do. Maybe if you keep it up further I will find a new collection. It doesn't take much time. All you have to do is randomly scan old posts and you will find plenty of hype from Fred's sources that has been proven to be false.