Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : IFLY - travel sales on the web pure play -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amigo Mike who wrote (3601)	1/5/1999 10:18:00 AM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4761

"What battles have you had with the Amigos ???? None I am aware of." A:None, that was one of the many PMs I got yesterday, reread the post, it is from someone who does not care for your analytical abilities. "What SEC filing must be made for an insider to report the sale of his/her shares ????" A:You don't know? The Tres Analiticos do not know? Well it's called a 144 filing. I cannot believe that you don't know this. "Why are you posting info on insider intended sales from 6-8 months ago ?" A:Because the insider sales are sizeable and relevant. So is the warrant stripping exercise that seems to still be way above your head. Perhaps this will help. If not you, certainly others will understand: sfgate.com "Why is it that you do not talk about the uniqueness of IRIS and what it might do productivity and revenue-wise for IFLY ???" A:As for the uniqueness, it is very questionable. I mean there ain't nothing that an html programmer can't do with a small budget? Besides who cares? The whole thing looks weak. Why should I answer any questions you put up when you've done no basic research and refuse to address basic scam stock issues? Stock down 2, I guarantee that there has been more insider selling into this PR blitz.