Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonkie who wrote (39811)	1/5/1999 9:35:00 AM
From: Colin Cody	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

OT, That all depends on what YOU believe the word "involved" to be. Given any individual, think about how many people someone might be associated with. Then think over the past 15 years how many of those people died under "odd" circumstances: Suicide, execution murder, airplane blowing up, that sort of thing. And then think of what percentage these unfortunate deaths are as compared to everyone the individual is close to/associated with. What's that percentage? very low, if not zero% isn't it. Now take that percentage for several honest individuals. They are ALL about zero% aren't they? Now look at the percentage of people associated with the two Clintons. It is clear that it is generally unhealthy to be too closely assoicted with the first family. This post isn't an acusation. This isn't an argument. This is in response to your question.