Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Erwin Sanders who wrote (13501)	1/5/1999 2:46:00 PM
From: P. Ramamoorthy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13949

Erwin - Their problem is sporadic earnings. Positive or negative results rely on whether they can book a sales contract for each qtr. So, it trading st its cash value, even after a nice article in Barron's. Longer hold. Ram

To: Erwin Sanders who wrote (13501)	1/19/1999 12:18:00 PM
From: John	Respond to of 13949

You bring up an interesting debate about a competency problem at SEEC or a PR problem. There was a time not too long ago when I would see 5 or more posts a day on SEEC. Now it can be 5 or more days between posts. If SEEC had some successes, PR would naturally follow, or so it seems. I am also confused about what business SEEC is in. Recently SEEC issued a press release about a Y2K contract in New York and as you said, now they seem to be peeling themselves of this business. Who and what are they all about now and what type of company are we investing in? Maybe this partly explains the stock price. I wonder?