Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (26010)	1/5/1999 1:31:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Neither Pezz nor Lazarre agrees with much of what I post. Its only creeps like you who are idiots and receive the treatment you find objectionable. Ask anyone, I don't suffer fools gladly. JLA

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (26010)	1/5/1999 2:08:00 PM
From: miraje	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

I would like to challenge everyone posting here to come up with more creative "ad hominems". Idiot, moron, et cetera, are becoming quite boring and repetitious. I'd much rather be called something like "intellectual eunuch" than "you moron". Or, when dissing a member of the fairer sex, something like "expressing condolences over your being in the throes of mental menopause" would be much more fun than "you idiot". More creative name calling would certainly enhance the entertainment value of this thread. Regards, JB