Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (26076)	1/5/1999 5:45:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

I cant, but it isnt my job either. It was Starrs job with an inexhaustible supply of time and money, to prove corruption with filegate. He couldnt do that, meaning there was no case there. Instead of doing the honorable thing, which was, for Starr to stand up and face his antagonists (and backers) and say, "I couldnt get anything" - he did the cowardly, desperate thing, which was, to get Clinton on a sexual matter that Clinton could not win. I have said all along (and Gerry Spence recently said this same thing on Larry King) that Clinton couldnt very well admit to the entire affair to Starr, that would have been disastrous. Many people (including myself) feel that lying was actually more honorable than blurbing the entire matter to a voyeur anyway.