SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Impeachment=" Insult to all Voters" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jim kelley who wrote (1302)1/5/1999 6:08:00 PM
From: Peter O'Brien  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2390
 
Sorry, it is the court's definition that counts (see above),
not Webster's, yours, or anyone else's.



To: jim kelley who wrote (1302)1/5/1999 9:56:00 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2390
 
Huh? Where in Websters do you find sexual relations defined as synonymous with and limited to sexual intercourse? I agree that sexual intercourse is a form of sexual relation. But you are arguing that ONLY sexual intercourse constitutes sexual relations. Where is that in Webster's???