Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (70598)	1/6/1999 9:06:00 AM
From: Diamond Jim	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

re: "Intel is at best fairly valued at today's price" Per Maria on CNBC, Intel is up 2 on instinet this AM"

To: GVTucker who wrote (70598)	1/6/1999 9:16:00 AM
From: Mary Cluney	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

GV,>>>Although Intel is at best fairly valued at today's price <<< That's what I thought you, Dr Snyder, Gene Parrott and some of the other 'value investors' were saying about 40-50 points ago. Please let me know when you are ready to capitulate - by then Intel may be topping and I'll start to look elsewhere <ggg>. BTW - earnings are coming out next week - what do you think? Mary

To: GVTucker who wrote (70598)	1/7/1999 3:33:00 AM
From: Joseph Pareti	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

The lemmings approach, here it goes again: >institutional block money flows >over the past two >years have performed poorly >compared to retail >money flows. and yet those "money managers" guys make more than a million bucks bonus a year for buying/recommending amazon.bullshit and the like. I sincerely admire John O'neill's courage for having shorted this piece of junk, a task that everybody ought to carry out. His brave action should be respected as an act to differentiate the street from Vegas.