Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (26162)	1/6/1999 11:57:00 AM
From: Conscience	Respond to of 67261

oh you got me with that one. Very good. Spend all night thinking that one up? Hope your brain doesn't hurt too much. Save your nickel words to impress your dates at the wrestling matches. I was in no way avoiding what was being said. I was not misdirecting anybody with my statements (Though you seem pretty good at that). I wasn't even throwing any cheap shots(You on the other hand seem to do that too). So by your own def your the high lord and master of the ad hominem. I dare say your better than your commander and chief. As for this Rev. guy, I'm going to have to look him up.Your sheer fascination (or is it more than that?) with this guy has peaked my interest. Though once again, my religious convictions are unlike anything you ever seen or dealt with. And once again that wasn't even the point of this post. You remind me of a tug boat that keeps trying to pull the ship in the wrong direction. While you may think you have good intentions your doing more harm than good. Actually, you seem more like lenny from Of mice and men. Once again you've managed to pull me away from my course. If you want to discuss something tangible, like maybe what this forum is supposed to be about, contact me. If all you are interested in is calling people names because they don't follow your doctrine (not that you could ever be wrong), don't bother, you will not get a response from me again.