SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: aknahow who wrote (27228)1/6/1999 11:23:00 AM
From: Machaon  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 32384
 
<< I know it's difficult to back off, but you were just plain wrong about the the capital transactions impacting earnings. >>

Originally, I was wrong about these transactions impacting revenues, as was pointed out to me by a few gentlemen on this thread.

At this time, I am not saying that capital transactions impact earnings. I am only saying that capital transactions impact cash on hand in the quarterly report. I think that I know what is going on here. I refer to the quarterly report as the earnings report. I think that this is a question of terminology.

Is that it? When one says "earnings report" does it only refer to the income statement? If so, I am wrong for using the wrong term. I usually say "earnings report" when I mean "quarterly report".

From now on, I will use "quarterly report" instead. That might end the confusion.

So......... to restate: the infusion of cash from the warrants and from the Elan deal should show up nicely on the quarterly report.

<< Robert, a call for $30 in the near term seems stupid! >>

Usually, IMHO, when an analyst does not state the time period, it is a one year prediction. So, I would think that Jim McCamant, was predicting $30 by 2000.

<< If you really think Mudcat is just a naysayer I suggest you not give him an opportunity to look smart. >>

I offer the entire thread an apology for doing this.

Regards, and good luck, Bob