SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (42434)1/6/1999 6:26:00 PM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 132070
 
SB, >>>i thought intel said they were sold out? <<<

Just so that there is some balance on this thread wrt to Intel - here is my 2c on the subject:

1. Intel was sold out 4Q.
2. Earnings next week will be better than expected.
3. The KNI Katmai New Instruction set to be released this quarter has the potential to surprise analyst just as the Xeon has surprised analysts with higher than expected revenues in a new market that many of the analyst do not fully understand.
4. The .18 micron process will put what remains of Intel competitors into a deeper hole - This will improve Intel manufacturing and reduce costs by an order of magnitude.
5. Merced next year will be significant - like real significant.
6. The potential of Intel is not fully understood - even by many of Intel's investors - wrt the enterprize market.
7. The full potential of the microprocessor and the role it will have in what Professor James F. Smith says "should usher in a new era of economic growth equal only to the industrial revolution at the turn of the century " is not fully factored into Intel pricing - IMO it is more important than the Internet.

It will be very dangerous to short Intel with any real money. It is a possibility (in my very humble opinion) 1999 earnings can exceed $5.00. $6 or $7 is not impossible.

Regards,

Mary




To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (42434)1/7/1999 11:43:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
Skeets, The exact lies from Intel were "sold out, couldn't keep up with demand, and huge pc sales." Instead, it was just a round of monopoly price gouging. <G>

MB



To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (42434)1/7/1999 6:07:00 PM
From: Peter Singleton  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
Skeeter, MB,

Didn't someone on this thread or one of the semicon threads say INTC's "capacity constraints" Q4 may have been because of a mismatch between wafer starts and actual demand ... hence a forecasting error, not evidence of longterm imbalance between supply and demand.

Peter