Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Conscience who wrote (26272)	1/6/1999 6:39:00 PM
From: Bill	Respond to of 67261

<<just keep asking to prove anything she's saying and she just gives up.>> That just proves she's a liberal.

To: Conscience who wrote (26272)	1/6/1999 6:46:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

Conscience, its because Im tired of answering the same questions. Id rather talk about the tax code or health care or Steve Forbes or something now.

To: Conscience who wrote (26272)	1/6/1999 8:39:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Respond to of 67261

What's the deal with this "answer my questions" junk anyway? Why does anybody owe you an answer to your loaded questions? Nobody ever answers anybody's questions here. If you want to see an extended comical "substantive debate", with lots of questions and "answers", you should look at the tail end of Subject 22775, starting at Message 5825122 , where I get into this fairly insane word game with sometime participant K about the (then upcoming) November election. Starting as follows: Want to know my personal solution? Everybody running for Congress this Nov. ought to state how they would vote on impeachment, given the "facts" known so far. Put it to a vote. Somehow, given the way the polls are running, I doubt this will be a generally acceptable solution, but I'd find it an honest one. Would you have a problem with that? Or would you prefer to engage in more "substantive debate" on the matter? Then follow the amusing string of answers to that question. As I expected at the time, the issue was mostly softpedaled before the election, but not afterward. That's integrity for you.