SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Eutro ( EUTO ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Bender who wrote (9932)1/6/1999 11:51:00 PM
From: Binder  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12043
 
Jim,
I can't deny that I am negative on this stock. Frankly, I can't find any positives here.

If someone broke into my house and stole my computer, and I had a really good idea of who it was, would I call that person with a list of questions? Especially if everything the person ever told me in the past turned out to be false? Of course not. I would call the police, and report my suspicions to them, let my insurance company buy me a new computer and let the police handle it. So, why should we call the company and ask these questions?

I agree, the company indeed owes the shareholders an explanation (again), but I think they owe it to more than one person on the phone. There are many questions to be asked, but I do not feel that an organized effort between individuals is appropriate. I think that if any individual feels that this company did something wrong, then they should file the appropriate complaint with the SEC, and let the SEC do their job. It probably would not be smart to discuss your complaint much after that, imo.

My experience has been that the company has not always told the truth. Perhaps if questioned by someone with more authority than the average investor asking questions on the telephone, they may be more inclined to do so.

I appreciate the advice, however.

I respect their right to defend themselves, and if they are ever put into a position where they do so truthfully, I'll be tuned in.

Binder

P.S. - I sure would like to see where the Wilkenson's ties to the companies with whom Euto had "deals" was ever discussed on any of the many threads on this company. Any idea when that was?



To: James Bender who wrote (9932)1/6/1999 11:53:00 PM
From: Judith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12043
 
James,

I am truly sorry to see you still defending Floyd and Co. Although I am totally out of EUTO, I for one believed you were honest in your assessment of EUTO. I hate to admit I judged you so incorrectly.

How can you look at the mis-information, lying, manipulation, dilution of value etc. that has been done by this company and still say someone should call and ask questions. We have asked over and over again so many different questions, only to find out we weren't told the truth.

You have to be kidding in your remark that we owe the Wilkenson's an opportunity to respond to the information discovered on all the company ownerships. The shareholders owe Floyd NOTHING! I think he owes many of us plenty of our hard earned money. No one wants to hear anymore of his lies....he taught Brad how to lie so convincingly - must make him so proud!

You criticize the negative opinions. Well, there is a lot to be negative about. What are you still defending? It would seem any rational person would show some concern upon hearing some of the information that has been discovered. Instead you don't voice one bit of concern, just continue to stand behind this SCAM. To me that means you are either dumb or part of the scam.

Tell me one positive thing that EUTO has accomplished in the past year that is verifiable or audited? They have failed at every business plan they have announced or told investors about. What business is this company in now anyway???? A lot of research has been done and people are pointing out the negative findings. Don't criticize them, but rather tell us your positive findings, if you have any!!!

Gee, I hate it when I misjudge someone's character! (and lose tons of money because of it!!!!)

Judith