Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stealthy who wrote (20913)	1/7/1999 9:38:00 AM
From: Sawtooth	Respond to of 152472

<<I strongly agree with your assessment of the latest WSJ item: Relatively positive on the Q, but still rather sloppy, presenting some half truths, and totally ignoring the central issue of Intel. Prop. Rights !! Too bad we can't get BOTH an objective AND thorough treatment of the complex set of issues surrounding the great Q's situation;...>> Stealthy: You give more credit to the knowledge of the writer than I do with your use of the terms half truth and ignoring, which usually indicate intent. Seems to me the writer did a fairly decent, best efforts, job right out to the limits of their understanding. Perhaps someone who is an expert in the subject matter should write an article and submit it for publication. Seems to me many publications, such as the WSJ, would welcome or at least consider the perspective of a well written, accurate article from a qualified industry member or other expert. "If we build it they will come" does not seem to work very well in business. Wonder what the Q is doing to educate the journalists. We like to talk here about how the Q is the world's best kept secret. Not so sure I like that. Regardless, I'm thinking the Q is currently in final countdown for lift off. Best kept secrets can't usually be kept forever! Likely short term correction will give me an opportunity to add just a "pinch" more Q to my holdings. Regards.