Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : America On-Line (AOL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (1845)	1/7/1999 11:47:00 AM
From: RocketMan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41369

Thanks, Chuzzlewit, I think we are all trying to learn more about our investment in AOL. The more informed we are -- about both positive and negative -- the better chance we have to make money, which this is all about. Interesting perspective on stock options. You make excellent points, and I can't disagree with what you said, although I was addressing it from a different point of view. I included the large stock option holders, along with the institutions, as a way of describing the breadth of AOL owners. Whether that is a positive or negative for AOL's long-term appreciation is debatable, and you make some valid points that it might be more of a negative. OTOH, those holding options are not as detrimental as the day traders and momentum players that are responsible for much of the volatility of internet stocks. As far as the impact of employee stock options, there is a difference, I think, between companies that are clearly growing and those that are using options as a way of offsetting salaries and other costs. A small company living day to day can offer stock options and thereby have the investor provide the incentive for hiring good people, and that is very risky to the investor. Such employees are likely to sell at their first opportunity, particularly if there is near term appreciation. However, a solid company that is growing, and that pays competitive salaries and so forth, is not in that same grouping. I'm sure that many employees will cash in options, and options can be repriced, etc, as you said. If you look at AOL's insider trading you will see there are many employees cashing in all the time. Case himself cashes in significant positions every year, for whatever personal reasons he may have. I can't blame any employee who takes profits, but I would be surprised if they cashed in all of their options, given the company's growth. Furthermore, having options gives employees an incentive to keep the company growing, although there may be some that have gotten so wealthy that they no longer care. One other thing, given that institutions hold and soak up the float, it can be argued that employee sales are healthy in keeping liquidity in the stock. Well, I don't know what the answer is, but I did want to make those points because there are several sides to the issue of employee stock options. But I think the biggest problem AOL faces is how to expand into broadband without breaking the bank and without giving up their independence. Cable and telcos can be pretty aggressive and consuming. Again, good luck!

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (1845)	1/8/1999 3:18:00 AM
From: Jorge	Respond to of 41369

Chuzz....AOL, THE RULE MAKER, from Motley Fool Instead of me giving you my thoughts I'm going to print an article from today's Motley Fool's Rule Maker Section...It gives a good summary of why AOL is such a great company. ********************************************* <THE RULE MAKER PORTFOLIO> AOL AS RULE MAKER By Phil Weiss (pweiss@homemail.com) Towaco, NJ (Jan. 7, 1999) -- From a stock market perspective, 1998 could easily be referred to as the year of the Internet stock. If you look through any list of the best performing stocks of last year, you'll see a preponderance of companies that are commonly referred to as "Internet" stocks. Picking some of the right ones as our friends in the Rule Breaker Portfolio did lead to some rather large gains. The Rule Maker Portfolio did beat the S&P 500 Index last year, but some may wonder if and when we plan to add any Internet stocks to our portfolio. As a matter of fact, a Fool recently asked about that in a post on our Message Boards. This is really not an easy question to answer. The first thing to consider is that our investment strategy is inherently much more conservative than that in the Rule Breaker Portfolio. Many of these "hot" companies don't have the history behind them that we really look for in selecting Rule Makers. As a matter of fact, many of them have never even had any earnings, so they fail our net margin test rather handily. Although failing one of our tests doesn't automatically knock a company out of the running, as a general rule, companies that are not yet profitable have a tough time making it into our portfolio. Last July I started to think about the net stocks and whether any of them fell under the Rule Maker heading. After some analysis, I concluded that there were two that could fit the bill -- America Online (NYSE: AOL) and Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO). I purchased some shares of what I considered to be the stronger of the two on two different occasions this past August. The stock that I chose was in Tom's Simpleton Portfolio. It is also the #1 holding in the Rule Breaker Portfolio -- AOL. Ironically, AOL is a stock that I sold at a profit after holding it for about 6 weeks back in 1995, when I was a lot less Foolish in my investing style than I am now. Hmm... maybe I should post something about this in the My Dumbest Investments Folder, though I will say that my reasons for selling AOL at that time proved to be right, as it fell by 60-70% after I sold it. Actually, my biggest mistake was not buying the shares back after the stock fell. Ouch! Kind of makes it sound like I'm talking about market timing there doesn't it. Let's take AOL through the paces and see why I think it can be considered a Rule Maker. Normally I focus more on the numbers when I do this kind of analysis, but tonight I'm going to focus more on what I see as the beauty of the business model. 1. Repeat Purchase Business -- This is pretty easy. AOL now has over 15 million subscribers. There are also another 2 million or so on CompuServe and around 2.5 million internationally. Each paying a monthly subscription fee month after month after month. That doesn't even count all the advertising and e-commerce revenue the company gets. I'd say passing this one is a no-brainer. 2. Global Consumer Brand -- As I noted above, AOL has around 2.5 million subscribers internationally. Plus, the Web is available around the globe. Looks like we're 2 for 2. 3. Sporting Strong Historical Performance -- AOL had only one million subscribers in 1994. On November 12th of last year, it hit the 14 million mark. By December there were 15 million subscribers -- the last million were the fastest in AOL's history. According to Value Line, over the last five years AOL's revenues have grown at an average rate of 70% per year. Earnings during that time have grown by an average rate of 35.5% per year. That sounds like pretty strong historical performance to me as well. 4. Super-Size the Company -- Piece of cake. Market cap over 70 billion. Sales for the latest fiscal year were over $2.6 billion. 5. A direction that exceeds the location -- Recently AOL released a survey in conjunction with Roper Starch Worldwide in which it was found that nearly half of Internet users said that the Internet is becoming a necessity. As a matter of fact, 67% of those surveyed said that they would prefer an Internet connection as opposed to TV or a phone if they were stranded on a desert island. This is just one more indication of how the Internet is becoming a part of the daily life of so many people. Those figures I presented on the number of users above mean that subscribers have grown by a growth factor of 15 in four years (an annualized growth rate of about 580%)! Combine that with the advertising revenues and the 68,000 new people a day logging on to the Internet. Makes AOL sound like a gorilla doesn't it? There is also the fact that as PC prices continue to fall PC's are becoming more and more accessible for home use. And, it's probably true that many of the people that are purchasing these PC's are less experienced users, which makes them more likely to veer towards AOL. I know that when I first got on the net I used AOL because it was easier than any of the other alternatives. That's probably a common reason that so many new users sign up with AOL, and it's a big part of its marketing appeal. There's one other thing that shouldn't be overlooked here -- all the deferred revenues sitting on AOL's balance sheet. This represents revenue that has already been paid to AOL, but for which AOL hasn't yet delivered all the related services. 6. Gross Margin that Exceeds 50% -- Oops, we fall a bit short here. Right now gross margins sit at only 36%. As a matter of fact, this is where Yahoo! and its lighter business model have a big edge over AOL. I see AOL's gross margins growing over time, due to increased operating efficiencies as well as the benefits that I believe will be realized from the Netscape (Nasdaq: NSCP) acquisition. 7. Net Margins of at Least 7% -- Recently AOL has reached this target and even more importantly net margins have been growing consistently. I see this trend continuing as well. 8. Cash No Less than 1.5 times debt -- No problem here at all. Cash has been growing. There is some debt, but not all that much. Right now this ratio is at 3.34. 9. Efficient Use of Cash -- AOL's flowie rivals that of Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT). Right now it's at 0.37. It's easy for this company to have a great flowie as it carries no inventory and has little in the way of receivables. So, to me AOL is a Rule Maker. However, I will say that it is a riskier stock than the rest of the holdings in our portfolio. I think that for the long-term investor this is a great company to own. Not many companies can match its economics and from what I can see it has a great future as well. Do you agree or disagree with my thoughts on AOL? Do you think that Yahoo! would have been a better choice? Maybe some other company? Please share your thoughts on our Companies Message Board. Phil Weiss, Fool Cash-King Strategy Folder Cash-King Companies Folder ******************************************* Regards, George