Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (15332)	1/7/1999 12:12:00 PM
From: Spider Valdez	Respond to of 26163

you are promoting more dribble dear. the common stock was cancelled & preferred was issued. all sec requirements to do so dear have been met. i defy you dear to prove otherwise. who were the lawyers names dear that litigated this arbitration where you claim qualey & sylver were present 5 jan.? can you give us there name so we can get there endorsement of the claims you are promoting here? can you also give us name of the arbitrator(s) dear so we can get there endorsement of these claims you are promoting? it is strange that all these arbitration hearings you suppose are all always continued dear. you seem very aware that a hearing resulting in a "judgement", like the one you previously promoted & later had to admit you lied about after being unable to live up to your claim you were "scanning" it, would merit you having to produce ANOTHER judgement to 'procure & scan'! lololol ! please give us these attorneys names dears that will endorse the wellrich claims you so vehemently promote here that sylver & qualey were in court with them arbitrating 5 jan.. spider

To: Janice Shell who wrote (15332)	1/16/1999 9:41:00 PM
From: wonk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Amusing, no? We've also been wondering about cost of sales and cost of processing... The COGS calculation goes something like this: finished goods inventory at the beginning of the period + Cost of Goods Manufactured less the finished goods inventory at the end of the period = Cost of goods sold. There is a sub-schedule for cost of goods manufactured = Change in work in Process inventory + direct labor + factory overhead. Looking at the two Qs, the balance sheet item for "Inventory Overhead Applied" is unchanged from the "audited" statement in the 10K. Most curious. Remembering that their accountant/auditor resigned at the end of last year, I would surmise that they are doing there own data entry and just do not know how to make the entries. ww