Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas J. Smith who wrote (5536)	1/7/1999 1:54:00 PM
From: Jock Hutchinson	Respond to of 10072

Once again the Charts prove only the truth What proves the truth is the history of your posts. Those posts demonstrate that once again you are an outright liar. Remember this post where you boasted that Iomega was more oversold at 3 and 15/16s than it was at 33? IOM is now more overbought (at 3.94) based on Technicals, than it was at $33 and at $4.50 put together. You wrote that you liar. That wasn't but three months ago when you were the mockery of the entire thread: Message 6048830 Of course that boast in the above post that you were claiming you were short Iomega when it was at 33 (a split adjusted 16.5) was also proven to be a lie. Thus, what we have is a double play of sorts. Tom Smith lies in October 1998, and is proven as such with his previous posts. Then he lies again, and the same post that he lied in from October 1998 demonstrates he lied in January 1999. Just leave and go somewhere else with your really stupid lies.